Slow Food Columbus

The health benefits of coffee

Posted on:


beansThe conventional wisdom is that coffee is, at best, mildly bad for you. This conclusion tends to be based, I suspect, on impressionistic evidence, instinct (bitterness being one of nature’s ways of indicating toxicity), the widespread availability of bad coffee (bitterness being a characteristic of overroasted or over-extracted coffee), and general distrust of caffeine.

Scientific studies, on the other hand, suggest that there may well be considerable health benefits to coffee consumption. Previous studies have suggested that it can help to prevent liver cancer and diabetes; now, a large-scale study that tracked men and women over two decades has concluded that coffee consumption may lower your risk of heart attack, perhaps dramatically.

Admittedly, as a huge coffee fan I’m hardly an unbiased source. But I will admit that I’m a bit baffled that coffee has developed the evil reputation that it has among advocates of natural and organic foods. Coffee beans are entirely natural, and the process of separating them from coffee cherries and drying them generally is as well: no one who has seen raw coffee spread out to dry in the sun can quarrel with its natural pedigree. The only thing we do to it is roast it and infuse it into water, which is pretty much what we do with tea.

But flavored coffee — now that’s unnatural.

For those who are interested, I’ll reprint an older New York Times article on coffee and health below the fold.


August 15, 2006

Coffee as a Health Drink? Studies Find Some Benefits

Coffee is not usually thought of as health food, but a number of recent studies suggest that it can be a highly beneficial drink. Researchers have found strong evidence that coffee reduces the risk of several serious ailments, including diabetes, heart disease and cirrhosis of the liver.

Among them is a systematic review of studies published last year in The Journal of the American Medical Association, which concluded that habitual coffee consumption was consistently associated with a lower risk of Type 2 diabetes. Exactly why is not known, but the authors offered several explanations.

Coffee contains antioxidants that help control the cell damage that can contribute to the development of the disease. It is also a source of chlorogenic acid, which has been shown in animal experiments to reduce glucose concentrations.

Caffeine, perhaps coffee’s most famous component, seems to have little to do with it; studies that looked at decaffeinated coffee alone found the same degree of risk reduction.

Larger quantities of coffee seem to be especially helpful in diabetes prevention. In a report that combined statistical data from many studies, researchers found that people who drank four to six cups of coffee a day had a 28 percent reduced risk compared with people who drank two or fewer. Those who drank more than six had a 35 percent risk reduction.

Some studies show that cardiovascular risk also decreases with coffee consumption. Using data on more than 27,000 women ages 55 to 69 in the Iowa Women’s Health Study who were followed for 15 years, Norwegian researchers found that women who drank one to three cups a day reduced their risk of cardiovascular disease by 24 percent compared with those drinking no coffee at all.

But as the quantity increased, the benefit decreased. At more than six cups a day, the risk was not significantly reduced. Still, after controlling for age, smoking and alcohol consumption, women who drank one to five cups a day — caffeinated or decaffeinated — reduced their risk of death from all causes during the study by 15 to 19 percent compared with those who drank none.

The findings, which appeared in May in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, suggest that antioxidants in coffee may dampen inflammation, reducing the risk of disorders related to it, like cardiovascular disease. Several compounds in coffee may contribute to its antioxidant capacity, including phenols, volatile aroma compounds and oxazoles that are efficiently absorbed.

In another analysis, published in July in the same journal, researchers found that a typical serving of coffee contains more antioxidants than typical servings of grape juice, blueberries, raspberries and oranges.

“We were surprised to learn that coffee quantitatively is the major contributor of antioxidants in the diet both in Norway and in the U.S.A.,” said Rune Blomhoff, the senior author of both studies and a professor of nutrition at the University of Oslo.

These same anti-inflammatory properties may explain why coffee appears to decrease the risk of alcohol-related cirrhosis and liver cancer. This effect was first observed in 1992. Recent studies,published in June in The Archives of Internal Medicine, confirmed the finding.

Still, some experts believe that coffee drinking, and particularly caffeine consumption, can have negative health consequences. A study published in January in The Journal of the American College of Cardiology, for example, suggests that the amount of caffeine in two cups of coffee significantly decreases blood flow to the heart, particularly during exercise at high altitude.

Rob van Dam, a Harvard scientist and the lead author of The Journal of the American Medical Association review, acknowledged that caffeine could increase blood pressure and slightly increase levels of the amino acid homocysteine, possibly raising the risk for heart disease.

“I wouldn’t advise people to increase their consumption of coffee in order to lower their risk of disease,” Dr. van Dam said, “but the evidence is that for most people without specific conditions, coffee is not detrimental to health. If people enjoy drinking it, it’s comforting to know that they don’t have to be afraid of negative health effects.”



  • http://www.columbusfood.tv Zach

    I have multiple coworkers who consider themselves health nuts and refuse to drink coffee due to the nebulous “it’s bad for you.” It’s amazing what people will assume when they ignore the evidence…

    Speaking of coffee: Bear’s espresso > Happy Greek’s espresso

  • http://www.columbusfood.tv Zach

    I have multiple coworkers who consider themselves health nuts and refuse to drink coffee due to the nebulous “it’s bad for you.” It’s amazing what people will assume when they ignore the evidence…

    Speaking of coffee: Bear’s espresso > Happy Greek’s espresso

  • http://www.columbusfood.tv Zach

    I have multiple coworkers who consider themselves health nuts and refuse to drink coffee due to the nebulous “it’s bad for you.” It’s amazing what people will assume when they ignore the evidence…

    Speaking of coffee: Bear’s espresso > Happy Greek’s espresso

  • Bear

    Why, thanks, Zach…. Haven’t had the Happy Greek’s, but I assume that’s a good thing. :-)

    I think it’s really not so much a matter of ignoring the evidence as it is of (a) much of the evidence being pretty recent, (b) the existence of longstanding concerns about minor health issues related to caffeine consumption, and (c) the aforementioned nebulous “it’s bad for you” sentiment that seems to have a lot of traction for some reason. Blackness, tarriness, bitterness, who knows. But the stuff definitely gets a bad rap.

    One thing I’ve noticed, being in academia, is that academics tend to live a very long time, on average… and if coffee were really bad for you, they’d all be quite dead by the time they hit forty.

  • Bear

    Why, thanks, Zach…. Haven’t had the Happy Greek’s, but I assume that’s a good thing. :-)

    I think it’s really not so much a matter of ignoring the evidence as it is of (a) much of the evidence being pretty recent, (b) the existence of longstanding concerns about minor health issues related to caffeine consumption, and (c) the aforementioned nebulous “it’s bad for you” sentiment that seems to have a lot of traction for some reason. Blackness, tarriness, bitterness, who knows. But the stuff definitely gets a bad rap.

    One thing I’ve noticed, being in academia, is that academics tend to live a very long time, on average… and if coffee were really bad for you, they’d all be quite dead by the time they hit forty.